D.O.No.PMGK/M&C/Sp.Net/PA/D.Stt Dated 30th July, 2009
Dear Shri
Please refer to the spate of letters written to you on Speednet. You were advised to ensure that Speednet feeding should be 100% in respect of Project Arrow offices.
2. Analysis done on 28-07-2009 reveals that, offices shown in Annexure - I have done 100%. Accept and convey my congratulations to Postmaster/SPM/Staff who have achieved this.
3. Unfortunately offices shown in Annexure - II have done less than 100%. They belong to Kurnool and Tirupathi Divisions. Effective daily supervision is called for. When other Divisions could achieve 100%, why not Kurnool and Tirupati.
4. Besides, most disturbing is Hindupur HO and Renigunta SO showing zero performance. The Divisional Heads need to have checkmated this. Such debilitating performance is a sure way of getting ourselves into trouble. It is rather a poor commentary on the attention paid to this issue, despite workable advice tendered by R.O. again and again. There two offices should reach 100% within 24 hours, lest the matter will be viewed seriously.
5. Divisional Heads of the Divisions stated may please monitor and be on wavelength with other performing Divisions. Let me see appreciable performance from defaulting Divisions from date please.
6. It is not out of place to state that some patches have been developed and linked to speednet for facilitating sorting pin code wise and automatic transmission. Divisional Heads were advised to ensure dispatch of Speed Post Delivery Slips from non-computerised offices to parent Mail Offices. Only a few are being received. Even here supervision by the Divisional Heads is called for.
7. Mail divisional Superintendents are ensuring 100% uploading in Mail Offices. I appreciate their work in this regard. Similar performance by Postal Divisional Superintendents to be ensure for computerised Post Offices. They should not fail, whatever may be the reason. I look for such leadership. Let it be shown please, for our good and that of India Post.
With good wishes,
Yours sincerely,
Encl:Annexure I & II.
Sd/-
(B.V.SUDHAKUR)
To
Sr./Superintendent of Post Offices,
____[All Divisions]____ Division.
Copy to:
1)DPS, Kurnool for follow up.
2)ASP(PA)/ASP(Mails)/IP(BD. R.O.Kurnool for information.
SD/-
(B.V.SUDHAKUR)
ANNEXURE –I
The following fifteen Project Arrow Offices have shown 100% performance both in booking and delivery.
1)Gooty LSGSO............................... 9)Penukonda LSGSO
2)Chittoor HO................................ 10)Kurnool Camp B LSG SO
3)Chittoor Collectorate SO............ 11)Nandyal HO
4)Kuppam LSGSO .........................12)Proddatur HO
5)Badvel LSG SO ...........................13)Chandragiri HO
6)Kodur LSG SO ...........................14)Srikalahasti HO
7)L.R.Palli LSG SO........................ 15)Tirumala SO
8)Rajampet HO
__________________________________________________________________________________
ANNEXURE –II
In Booking: Kurnool HO = 78%
Dear Shri
Please refer to the spate of letters written to you on Speednet. You were advised to ensure that Speednet feeding should be 100% in respect of Project Arrow offices.
2. Analysis done on 28-07-2009 reveals that, offices shown in Annexure - I have done 100%. Accept and convey my congratulations to Postmaster/SPM/Staff who have achieved this.
3. Unfortunately offices shown in Annexure - II have done less than 100%. They belong to Kurnool and Tirupathi Divisions. Effective daily supervision is called for. When other Divisions could achieve 100%, why not Kurnool and Tirupati.
4. Besides, most disturbing is Hindupur HO and Renigunta SO showing zero performance. The Divisional Heads need to have checkmated this. Such debilitating performance is a sure way of getting ourselves into trouble. It is rather a poor commentary on the attention paid to this issue, despite workable advice tendered by R.O. again and again. There two offices should reach 100% within 24 hours, lest the matter will be viewed seriously.
5. Divisional Heads of the Divisions stated may please monitor and be on wavelength with other performing Divisions. Let me see appreciable performance from defaulting Divisions from date please.
6. It is not out of place to state that some patches have been developed and linked to speednet for facilitating sorting pin code wise and automatic transmission. Divisional Heads were advised to ensure dispatch of Speed Post Delivery Slips from non-computerised offices to parent Mail Offices. Only a few are being received. Even here supervision by the Divisional Heads is called for.
7. Mail divisional Superintendents are ensuring 100% uploading in Mail Offices. I appreciate their work in this regard. Similar performance by Postal Divisional Superintendents to be ensure for computerised Post Offices. They should not fail, whatever may be the reason. I look for such leadership. Let it be shown please, for our good and that of India Post.
With good wishes,
Yours sincerely,
Encl:Annexure I & II.
Sd/-
(B.V.SUDHAKUR)
To
Sr./Superintendent of Post Offices,
____[All Divisions]____ Division.
Copy to:
1)DPS, Kurnool for follow up.
2)ASP(PA)/ASP(Mails)/IP(BD. R.O.Kurnool for information.
SD/-
(B.V.SUDHAKUR)
ANNEXURE –I
The following fifteen Project Arrow Offices have shown 100% performance both in booking and delivery.
1)Gooty LSGSO............................... 9)Penukonda LSGSO
2)Chittoor HO................................ 10)Kurnool Camp B LSG SO
3)Chittoor Collectorate SO............ 11)Nandyal HO
4)Kuppam LSGSO .........................12)Proddatur HO
5)Badvel LSG SO ...........................13)Chandragiri HO
6)Kodur LSG SO ...........................14)Srikalahasti HO
7)L.R.Palli LSG SO........................ 15)Tirumala SO
8)Rajampet HO
__________________________________________________________________________________
ANNEXURE –II
In Booking: Kurnool HO = 78%
In delivery
1)Cuddapah HO = 99%
2)Pattikonda LSG SO = 43%
3)Yemmiganur LSGSO = 47%
4)Kurnool HO = 91%
5)Tirupati HO = 90%
6)Renigunta LSG SO = 60%
7)S.V. University LSG SO = 90%
[ Letter released on 31.7.2009]
No comments:
Post a Comment